Creation vs Evolution PDF Print E-mail
Written by The Watchman   
Monday, 05 December 2011 22:03
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Creation Vs Evolution

Greg_on_the_Mountain_SmallI though it a good idea to share this piece of a conversation I was having with one of my good atheist friends regarding Creation vs Evolution. Perhaps it will give you some food for thought .

By the laws of nature (Which are God's laws by they way) each animal mates with it's own kind. If interspecies mating takes place such as with a Horse and Donkey...the result is a sterile mule which can not propagate it's species. This is one example of how evolution does not work.

Additionally...  Millions or billions of years added to an equation of primordial soup does not explain where the primordial soup came from.  To postulate as Macro-Evolutionists do...that "all matter and energy existed in a pinpoint of light smaller than a period on this page...exploded into what we now know as the universe." I am paraphrasing of course.  But the point is...where did the matter and energy come from? No one knows.  So if we discuss the most basic aspect of evolution...which is Origins...one has to explain from where all the matter and energy originated in the first place...before it could be compacted into a tiny size particle.  

Furthermore...micro-evolution is a reasonable theory.  I would put it on the same level as adaptation of a species to it's environment.  And this most certainly had to take place when there was a huge flood that covered the earth and drastically changed the entire environment of the planet.  This flood also explains and unravels many of the "scientific" conclusions of evolutionists not the least of which is the supposed passing of millions or billions of years upon this earth.

From a purely scientific perspective it has been shown that (for example) Carbon 14 dating has proven unreliable. Regarding "scientific" fossil evidence...such as the numerous finds of "missing links" ...all of them have been proven to be fakes and frauds.  If there were such a thing as evolution of species...there would be evidence ALL OVER THE PLACE of in between species skeletal remains.  Not to mention that we would probably see living examples of evolution in major categories...such as people with gills...or...more apparent vestiges of tails...or SOMETHING!  But alas...there is nothing to prove that there was ever a missing link.  

All the similarities among species argue for a singular creator/designer who is master of the DNA rather than a long and improbable series of mutated accidents that created such things as the eye, the brain, the visual cortex, and the complexities of even a simple cellular structure and it's related proteins...(all of which have to be present for the whole thing to work at all) The chances of this happening (mathematically speaking) are outside the range of probability according to the laws of mathematical probability...which is a science in itself that contradicts the the lunatic ideas of desperate evolutionary scientists. I will trust math any day...over an unproven theory.  

SO...I could go on and on...about the proofs and give you some good reading to sway your intellectual tendencies towards a more rational designer/creator principle...but I am not sure if you would even be interested in going that far. Just in case you are...I recommend Dr. Walt Brown and his book The Hydro Plate Theory.  This is a theory that encompasses a vast array of proofs against millions and billions of years...as well proposing from a reasonable scientific perspective the very real probabilities of Creation...why the dinosaurs died...how the Grand Canyon was formed rapidly and how many factors work together to disprove the shallow and Godless theories of evolution.  

Evolution's primary conclusion is that there is no God...that we are all evolved animals.  This necessarily leads to a major issue with the concept of morality and moral authority.  If there is no moral authority higher than mankind...to which we must give account...then morality is truly subjective.  This results in ALL ARGUMENTS about good and evil being null and void. Because one can NEVER justify a moral argument against another...unless there is a higher authority to which both are held to account. That's enough for now I suppose.

The Strong Watchman

 

Add comment


Economic Outlook

Economic Outlook
 
Members : 3923
Content : 805
Content View Hits : 1040471
Copyright © 2012 The Strong Watchman. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
 

Who's Online

We have 356 guests online

Help. Donate.

Hey you...the reader! Help support this site! We need your help. Thanks!

Amount: 

EBook - The Root Of Success In Online Marketing - How To Drive Traffic

Banner